Personal tools

Log in | New to AuthorAID? find out more or join now.

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

You are here: Home > News > What Instructions Do Peer Reviewers Receive?

What Instructions Do Peer Reviewers Receive?

By Barbara Gastel | 31 Jul 2010

Greetings again. I hope that all is going well.

Recently an AuthorAID blog post addressed the question “How are peer reviewers chosen?” The current post addresses a related question, also from the Tanzania workshop: “What instructions do peer reviewers receive?”

The answer differs among journals. Some journals just tell reviewers to evaluate the paper. Other journals provide detailed instructions.

Commonly, journals ask peer reviewers to

  • complete a rating form (for example, on which they rate various aspects of the paper on a scale of 1 to 5);
  • give the editor confidential comments, which will not be shared with the author; and
  • provide a set of comments that both the author and the editor will read.

The set of comments for both author and editor commonly begins by noting general strengths and weaknesses of the paper. Typically, page-by-page comments follow.

Often, journals ask peer reviewers to evaluate items such as the following:

  • the importance of the topic
  • the originality of the research
  • the quality of the research design
  • the soundness of the conclusions
  • the suitability for the intended audience
  • the quality of tables and figures (if any)
  • the general quality of the writing

(Peer reviewers aren’t expected, though, to correct the writing.)

Knowing what journal editors ask peer reviewers to do can help authors write papers that journals will accept. As you design your research and write and revise your paper, perhaps consider the list of items above. The result might be a more publishable paper.

Wishing you a good week— Barbara

Thank you so much

Posted by Dr.Amal Mohamed Moustafa at 01 Aug 2010 12:44 PM

Thank you so much for your kind help & interested knowledge

Does training help reviewers?

Posted by Matt Hodgkinson at 01 Aug 2010 06:20 PM

As a slight tangent to your topic, there's been some research done on the effect of training on peer review: perhaps surprisingly, the editors at the BMJ showed that a short course doesn't seem to have any long-term effect. In the short term, it lead to more papers rejected.

"The evidence for benefit of training was no longer apparent on further testing six months after the interventions. Training had no impact on the time taken to review the papers but was associated with an increased likelihood of recommending rejection".

See Schroter et al., BMJ 2004;328:673. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/328/7441/673